MCDANIEL
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court granted the plaintiff's unopposed petition for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, awarding $7,871.46.
Plaintiff's counsel sought attorney fees under the EAJA, requesting a higher hourly rate than statutorily specified due to cost of living increases. T…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Assignment Of Fees cases and more on FLexlaw
This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Petition for Award of Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. No. 30; “Petition”), filed June 23, 2021. In the Petition, Plaintiff’s counsel seeks an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) in the amount of $7,871.46. Petition at 1, 3; see id. at 6-7 (“Itemization of Time”). Plaintiff represents that Defendant does not oppose the relief requested. Id. at 2, 8. Plaintiff’s counsel indicates a total of 38.1 hours were expended in the representation of Plaintiff before the Court. Id. at 3; see also Itemization of Time. Plaintiff requests an hourly rate of $206.60. Petition at 3. Plaintiff is seeking a higher hourly rate than the $125 specified by statute based on the increase in the cost of living since 1996, when the attorney’s fee rate was last adjusted by Congress. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(A) (permitting fee awards at rates higher than $125 per hour upon the Court’s determination that cost of living has increased). Having examined the Consumer Price Index and the representations made in the Petition, the Court concludes an increase in inflation does justify a proportionate increase in attorney’s fees.1
Plaintiff has assigned his rights to any entitlement of attorney’s fees due under the EAJA to his counsel. See Petition at Ex. 1 (Contingent Fee Agreement). Regarding the assignment, Plaintiff represents the following: The parties agree that after the Court issues an order accepting this Petition, the Commissioner will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the government. If the United States Department of Treasury determines that . . . Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, the government will accept Plaintiff’s Assignment of EAJA fees . . . and pay fees directly to Plaintiff’s counsel.
Id. at 4. In light of the foregoing, it is ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff’s Unopposed Petition for Award of Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. No. 30) is GRANTED.
Vacate. Kou Revalth
JAMES R. KLINDT
United States Magistrate Judge keb Copies: Counsel of Record