GUDYNOWSKI

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

Defendant. /

ORDER1

Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 30) on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Petition for EAJA Fees Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2312(d) (Doc. 29). Judge McCoy recommends granting the Motion. Neither party timely objected, so the matter is ripe for review. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge’s R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F. 2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). In the absence of specific objections, there is no

reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F. 3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994).

After careful consideration and an independent review of the file, the Court accepts and adopts the R&R (Doc. 30) in full. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 30) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and incorporated into this Order. (2) Plaintiff’s Unopposed Petition for EAJA Fees Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2312(d) (Doc. 29) is GRANTED.

a. Plaintiff is AWARDED $8,116.37 in attorney’s fees. b. If the United States Department of Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, the Government may pay these fees directly to Plaintiff’s counsel.

(3) The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff for $8,116.37 in attorney’s fees. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on April 19, 2021.

,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies: All Parties of Record