BARRERA
v.
HOME PARAMOUNT PEST CONTROL COMPANY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, approving the FLSA settlement with modifications.
Plaintiff sued Defendant for unpaid overtime wages under the FLSA and FMLA. The parties submitted a settlement agreement for approval. A Magistrate Ju…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Family And Medical Leave Act (Fmla) cases and more on FLexlaw
Plaintiff sued Defendant for failure to pay overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and for violations of the Family Medical Leave Act. (Doc. 1.) The parties moved for approval of their FLSA settlement agreement under Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. United States ex rel. United States Department of Labor, 679 F. 2d 1350, 1355 (11th Cir. 1982). (Doc. 27 (“Motion”); Doc. 27-1 (“Agreement”).) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly recommends granting the Motion in part. (Doc. 28 (“R&R”).) He recommends striking the modification and confidentiality provisions, finding the Agreement fair and reasonable with these changes. (Id.) The parties filed a notice of no-objection to the R&R. (Doc. 29.) So the Court has examined the R&R only for clear error. See Wiand v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 8:12-cv-557-T-27EAJ, 2016 WL 355490, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 28, 2016); see also
Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is adopted in its entirety.
It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. U.S. Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 28) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made
a part of this Order. 2. The parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of the FLSA Settlement (Doc. 27) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART: a. The Court STRIKES the modification and confidentiality
provisions of paragraphs 7(a) and 12 from the Agreement; b. With these changes, the parties’ Agreement (Doc. 27-1) is APPROVED;
c. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; d. In all other respects, the Motion is DENIED.
3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on April 13, 2021.
or ROY B. DALTON JR: United States District Judge
3.