J. S. AKIN, SAMUEL AKIN, R. F. AKIN, E. B. AKIN, MRS. MOLLIE PRINCE AND HER HUSBAND E. L. PRINCE, MRS. NELIA HENRY AND HER HUSBAND F. J. HENRY, MRS. IDA DITMORE AND HER HUSBAND P. H. DITMORE, MRS. NELLIE BALL AND HER HUSBAND GEORGE BALL, MRS. MAGGIE MAUNEY AND HER HUSBAND P. A. MAUNEY, ELIHU BURNHAM, MARTHA PERVOE AND HER HUSBAND DUNCAN PERVOE, A. S. BURNHAM, JOANNAH BURNHAM, WILLIE MCCALL AND HER HUSBAND CHARLES MCCALL, J. S. BURNHAM, JOHN BURNHAM, LOUIS E. BURNHAM, A MINOR, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND ELIHU BURNHAM, CHAS. H. BURNHAM, A MINOR, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND ELIHU BURNHAM, AND MARY J. DOWNING AND HER HUSBAND C. D. DOWNING, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
SARAH MORGAN, W. L. MORGAN, CHARLES MORGAN, JOHN J. MORGAN AND JULIA A. MORGAN, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR

Fla. | 1905-06-01
All the Justices concur.
50 Fla. 172 Florida Supreme Court (1905) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :

Per Curiam :

The certificate of the clerk to the record of this case is defective in that it fails to set forth that it contains a true and correct “copy” of all the papers and proceedings in said cause, &c. The identical defect has been frequently held fatal by this court. First National Bank of Pensacola v. Oxford Lake Line, 45 Fla. 275, 34 South Rep. 893; Burnham v. Driggers, 44 Fla. 168, 32 South. Rep. 796.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Dow B. Keigans v. State, 52 Fla. 57 (Fla. 1906)
    …prepared and the duty counsel owe clients as well as the court in this respect, see State v. Madoil, 12 Fla. 151, text 155; Florida Land Rock Phosphate Co. v. Anderson, 50 Fla. 501, 39 South. Rep. 392, and authorities therein cited; Akin v. Morgan, 50 Fla. 172, 39 South. Rep. 534; Porter v. Ewing, 51 Fla. 265, 39 South. Rep. 993. I find that the bill of exceptions does not set forth any of the charges or instructions, either those given by the Court of its own motion or at the request of counsel. Neither…
  • Dees v. Cora S. Cassels, 54 Fla. 485 (Fla. 1907)
    …re. It is therefore ordered that the appeal be dismissed, at the cost of the appellants. See Burnham v. Driggers, 44 Fla. 168, 32 South. Rep. 796; First National Bank of Pensacola v. Oxford Lake Line, 45 Fla. 275, 34 South. Rep. 893; Akin v. Morgan, 50 Fla. 172, 39 South. Rep. 534. Appeal dismissed. Shackleford, C. J., and Cockrell, and Whitfield, JJ., concur; Taylor and Hocker, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw