FINEHOUT
v.
BDE FLORIDA, LLC

M.D. Fla. | 2021-01-19
No. 8:20-cv-1634
District Court, M.D. Florida (2021)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, approving the FLSA settlement agreement and dismissing the plaintiff with prejudice.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiffs Justin Finehout and Kevyn Kirkland sued Defendant BDE Florida LLC. The parties submitted a joint motion for approval of an FLSA settlement …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

This matter is before the Court on the report and recommendation of Christopher P. Tuite, United States Magistrate Judge, entered on December 22, 2020. (Doc. 35). Judge Tuite recommends that the “Joint Motion for Approval of FLSA Settlement Agreement and Dismissal with Prejudice” (Doc. 28) be granted and that the settlement be approved. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F. 2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F. 2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F. 3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff’d, 28 F. 3d

116 (11th Cir. 1994) (table). Upon consideration of the record, including Judge Tuite’s report and recommendation, the Court adopts the report and recommendation. The Court agrees with Judge Tuite’s detailed and well-reasoned findings and conclusions, including that the settlement agreement constitutes a fair and reasonable compromise of the dispute. See Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F. 2d

1350, 1353 (11th Cir. 1982). Consequently, the joint motion for approval of settlement is granted, and the settlement agreement is approved. Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: 1. Judge Tuite’s report and recommendation (Doc. 35) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED and INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE into this Order for all purposes, including appellate review.

2. The “Joint Motion for Approval of FLSA Settlement Agreement and Dismissal with Prejudice” (Doc. 28) is GRANTED. The settlement agreement (Doc. 28-1) is APPROVED. 3. Plaintiff Justin Finehout is dismissed as a party to this action with prejudice. 4. The Clerk is directed to terminate Justin Finehout as a party. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 19th day of January, 2021.

fr j \ y Kd PL. (Owe “4 i C4

TOM BARBER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw