PHILLIP GLASSMAN, APPELLANT,

v.

KEVIN O'GRADY AND RUDEN, BARNETT, MCCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A., A FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Erickson v. State, 565 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)
  …y of assuring that scoresheets are accurately prepared. Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(1), Committee Notes. In order to reach a fully informed sentencing decision, the trial court must have the benefit of an accurately prepared scoresheet. Dawson v. State, 532 So. 2d 89, 90 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). See Ratushinak v. State, 517 So. 2d 749, 753 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), rev. denied, 525 So. 2d 880 (1988); Hembree v. State, 519 So. 2d 1138, 1139 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). This requirement applies even if the trial court expresses an…
• Zeigler v. State, 647 So. 2d 272 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
  …of years in prison which is within the recommended guideline range. However, because the trial judge may have imposed a different sentence had he the benefit of a properly calculated scoresheet, defendant’s sentence must be vacated. Dawson v. State, 532 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); see also Davis v. State, 493 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). On remand, the trial judge may resentence defendant, under the original terms, to two concurrent terms of 20 years in prison, followed by five years probation, as such…
• Aleño Santana Madrigal v. State, 683 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
  …is entitled to be resentenced upon a properly calculated guidelines scoresheet. See Cochran v. State, 592 So. 2d 784 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Erickson v. State, 565 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), rev. denied, 576 So. 2d 286 (Fla.1991); Dawson v. State, 532 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). Erroneously using the 1.5 multiplier placed appellant in a sentencing range of 52.8 months to 88.0 months state imprisonment, with a recommended sentence of 70.4 months [*1095] imprisonment. Without the 1.5 multiplier, appellan…

Authorities Cited

• Tucker v. Chantal Fianson, 484 So. 2d 1370 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)