MELIKHOV
v.
DRAB
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, denying in part and denying without prejudice in part the Judgment Creditors' motion for writs of execution against nonparties.
The Magistrate Judge recommended denying the Judgment Creditors' motion for writs of execution against nonparties Naples Energy, LLC, Czech Energy USA…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Magistrate Judge Authority cases and more on FLexlaw
3. The Court DENIES the Judgment Creditors’ motion (Doc. 106) to the
extent it seeks to recover the civil fine assessed by the Court against the nonparties for civil contempt (Doc. 54).
4. The Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Judgment
Creditors’ motion (Doc. 106) to the extent it seeks to recover the Court’s previous awards of attorneys’ fees and costs. 5. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter final judgment in favor of the Judgment Creditors and against:
a. Naples Energy, LLC, Czech Energy USA, LLC, and Hana Drabova in the amount of $42,466.50 in attorneys’ fees and $1,549.39 in costs (Doc. 87 at 11). b. Judgment Debtor Ladislav Drab in the amount of $2,966.50 in attorneys’ fees (Doc. 99 at 5; Doc. 109 at 5). 6. After the Clerk of Court enters final judgments as directed above, the Judgment Creditors may renew their motion for writs of execution solely as to these awards of attorneys’ fees. ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida, on December 21, 2020. Sp
JOHN L. BADALAMENTI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Marina Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603 (11th Cir. 1994)
- Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776 (11th Cir. 1993)