THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
MARIA GONZALEZ AND SERGIO GONZALEZ, APPELLEES
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
MARIA GONZALEZ AND SERGIO GONZALEZ, APPELLEES
532 So. 2d 1127
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Vasquez v. State, 491 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Milete v. State, 439 So. 2d 337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kenson v. State, 577 So. 2d 694 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…(c), an arrest is not a prerequisite to a request for a blood test. Appellant voluntarily consented to the procedure, and no impediment to the use of the results exists. State v. Williams, 417 So. 2d 755 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); see State v. Trono-lone, 532 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Chu v. State, 521 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). We decline to adopt appellant’s interpretation of State v. Perez, 531 So. 2d 961 (Fla.1988), as mandating an arrest before a blood test is requested. In Perez, the Florida Suprem…
Authorities Cited
- Vasquez v. State, 491 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
- Julita Marie Milete v. State, 439 So. 2d 337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)