COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
v.
THE ALISTA GROUP, LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An LLC cannot represent itself in federal court and must retain licensed counsel.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission moved to strike the Answer filed by The Alista Group, LLC, because it was signed by an individual not license…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Answer as to Defendant Alista Group, LLC. (Doc. 15). Plaintiff Commodity Futures Trading Commission requests the Court strike Alista’s Answer (Doc. 12) because Alista is not represented by counsel. The time to respond has not lapsed, but given the applicable legal authority, the Court does not need the benefit of a response. On August 10, 2020, Defendants Alista and Marvin W. Courson III jointly filed an Answer and Affirmative Defenses. (Doc. 12). The Answer was signed by Marvin W. Courson III on behalf of himself and The Alista Group LLC.1 (Id., p. 5). Under 28 U.S.C. § 1654, a party may appear and conduct their own cases personally. But a lay person
Under Florida Statute 605.0717(1)(b), dissolution of a limited liability company does not “[p]revent commencement of a proceeding by or against the limited liability company in its name.” cannot represent any other person or entity. U.S. ex rel. Stronstorff v. Blake Med. Ctr., No. 8:01-CV-844-T-23MSS, 2003 WL 21004734, *1 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 13, 2003).
And nonnatural persons or artificial entities such as corporations, partnerships, and associations, must appear in federal court through licensed counsel. /d. (citing Rowland v. Cal. Men’s Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 201-02 (1993)); see also M.D. Fla. R. 2.03(e).
As a result, Marvin W. Courson III may represent himself in this action, but may not represent Alista. The Court must strike the Answer (Doc. 12) as to The Alista Group, LLC. The Answer (Doc. 12) remains in effect for Mr. Courson.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: (1) |The Motion to Strike Answer as to Defendant The Alista Group, LLC is
GRANTED.
(2) |The Answer (Doc. 12) is STRICKEN as to The Alista Group LLC, but remains in effect for Marvin W. Courson III. (3) The Clerk is directed to indicate on the docket that the Answer (Doc. 12) is stricken as to The Alista Group LLC only. (4) By October 6, 2020, The Alista Group will retain counsel to represent it, have counsel file a notice of appearance, and have counsel file a response to the Complaint. If The Alista Group LLC fails to comply by this deadline, the Court will recommend a default be entered against it. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on September 9, 2020.
Lida Ee La ell.