GIBBS
v.
MLK EXPRESS SERVICES, LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court accepted and adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting the parties' motion to approve the notice to potential claimants.
The parties filed an agreed motion to approve a proposed notice to potential claimants of a collective action. The Magistrate Judge recommended granti…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Magistrate Judge Authority cases and more on FLexlaw
MLK EXPRESS SERVICES, LLC, AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC., AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC., MANIHONG M. PHANOUVONG, LILA V. PHANOUVONG, AMAZON.COM, INC. and AG PLUS EXPRESS, LLC,
Defendants. /
ORDER1
Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”). (Doc. 191). Judge McCoy recommends granting the parties’ Agreed Motion to Approve the Parties’ Proposed Notice to Potential Claimants of Collective Action (Doc. 188) and approving their proposed notice form (Doc. 188-1). Several parties filed notices of nonobjection (Docs. 192; 193; 194). And the matter is ripe for review. A district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also
After a careful, complete, and independent examination of the file, the Court accepts and adopts Judge McCoy’s R&R in full. This was the last outstanding issue before the now-approved notice and consent forms can issue. So the parties are authorized to begin the notice process. For its own case management purposes only, the Court will administratively close this case during the notice period. This does not impact any deadlines set forth in the Amended Case Management Scheduling Order (Doc. 197) or the parties’ obligations. Within seven days of the notice period ending, the parties must notify the Court and case will be administratively reopened. Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 191) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein. 2. The parties’ Agreed Motion to Approve the Parties’ Proposed Notice to Potential Claimants of Collective Action Pursuant to Court Order [D.E.185] (Doc. 188) is GRANTED and their proposed notice (Doc. 188-1) is
APPROVED.
3. The parties are AUTHORIZED to begin the notice process.
4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to administratively close the case during the notice period. Within seven (7) days of the notice period ending, the parties must NOTIFY the Court and the case will be administratively reopened. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 8 day of July, 2020.
,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies: All Parties of Record
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776 (11th Cir. 1993)
- Williams v. Louie L. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982)