JAMES
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

M.D. Fla. | 2020-06-02
No. 2:19-cv-715
District Court, M.D. Florida (2020)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Holding

The court granted the Commissioner's unopposed motion for entry of judgment with remand.

Facts & Procedural History

The Commissioner of Social Security filed an unopposed motion requesting a remand of the case to the administrative law judge. The Commissioner sought…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Topics
Remand For Further Administrative Proceedings Social Security Act § 205(G) Medical Opinion Evaluation Remand

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Remand For Further Administrative Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court

Defendant. /

ORDER1

Before the Court is Defendant Commissioner of Social Security’s Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. 19). The Commissioner believes that a remand is appropriate to allow the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) to do the following: evaluate the opinions provided by treating physician Kenneth Gold, M.D., and VA disability determination; re-consider the severity, onset, and limiting effects of the claimant’s post- traumatic stress disorder using the special technique set forth in 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520a; re-assess the residual functional capacity assessment; as warranted, obtain supplemental evidence from a vocational expert to clarify the effect of the assessed limitations on the claimant’s ability to perform other work in the national economy; take any further action to complete the administrative record; and issue a new decision.

(Doc. 19 at 1). Plaintiff does not oppose the Motion. Under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Court has the power to enter judgment, reversing and remanding a social security case for rehearing. See also Shalala v. Schaefer, 509

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies: All Parties of Record

Footnotes
1 Disclaimer: Documents hyperlinked to CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By using hyperlinks, the Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide, nor does it have any agreements with them. The Court is also not responsible for a hyperlink’s availability and functionality, and a failed hyperlink does not affect this Order. U.S. 292, 296-98 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 101-02 (1991). Given the parties’ representations and agreement on the matter, the Court grants the Motion and remands for further proceedings. See Morgan v. Astrue, No. 2:11-cv-615-FtM-29SPC, 2012 WL 695840, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 1, 2012). Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. 19) is GRANTED. 2. Defendant's decision denying benefits is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings. 3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment, terminate all deadlines or pending motions, and close the file. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 2nd day of June, 2020.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw