CORONADO CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
BEN SCHER AND PAULA SCHER, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the association's failure to maintain common elements constituted a breach of its duties under the condominium act, justifying damages and attorney's fees.
Unit owners sued their condominium association after a sewage backup into their apartment due to negligent maintenance of common elements. The trial c…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Common Elements cases and more on FLexlaw
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
The appellees, who are unit owners at the Coronado condominium, sued the appellant association for negligent maintenance of a sanitary sewer in the common elements, which resulted in a noxious back flow of effluent into the Schers’ apartment. They won an order requiring the association to conform with its duties under the condominium act, and, after a jury trial, $160,000 in money damages for personal injuries and property damage.
On this appeal from the judgment entered pursuant to the verdict, we find no harmful error in the trial which requires reversal. See Rohrback v. Dauer, 528 So. 2d 1362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). We also hold that the trial court properly assessed attorney’s fees in the appellees’ favor for the prosecution of the entire case under section 718.303(1), Florida Statutes (1987).1 In our view, the cause was, within the meaning of the statute, clearly an “[action] for damages or for injunctive relief, or both, for failure to comply with [those] provisions” of the condominium law and declaration which require the association properly to maintain the common elements. See § 718.113, Fla.Stat. (1987); Schmeck v. Sea Oats Condominium Ass’n, 441 So. 2d 1092 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).
AFFIRMED.
. 718.303 Obligations of owners; waiver; levy of fine against unit by association.—
(1) Each unit owner and each association shall be governed by, and shall comply with the provisions of, this chapter, the declaration, the documents creating the association and the association bylaws. Actions for damages or for injunctive relief, or both, for failure to comply with these provisions may be brought by the association or by a unit owner against:
(a) The association.
(b) A unit owner. **
The prevailing party in any such action ... is entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees. This relief does not exclude other remedies provided by law....
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Colony Beach & Tennis Club, Ltd. v. Colony Beach & Tennis Club Ass'n, 456 B.R. 545 (M.D. Fla. 2011)…ecessary, board authority was sufficient”). “A condominium association may be liable for damages that result from negligent maintenance of the common elements.” Boyer, supra, § 190.20[2][e]; see, e.g., Coronado Condo. Ass’n v. Scher, 533 So.2d 295 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (“[the] unit owners ... sued the ... association for negligent maintenance of a sanitary sewer in the common elements [and] won an order requiring the association to conform with its duties under the Condominium Act”). In other wo…
Authorities Cited
- Schmeck v. The SEA Oats Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 441 So. 2d 1092 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)
- Mortell v. Keith, 528 So. 2d 1362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
- Rohrback v. Maxwell Dauer, 528 So. 2d 1362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)