JOHN HOSEY, BY AND THROUGH HIS WIFE AND GUARDIAN, MARCIA HOSEY, AND MARCIA HOSEY, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLANTS,
v.
CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, THE STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND BROWARD COUNTY, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the city is shielded by sovereign immunity because the placement of the light pole was a discretionary, planning-level function and no exceptions applied.
[1] The placement of a street light pole on a highway divider is a discretionary, planning-level function shielded by sovereign immunity.
[2] A municipality is not liable for injuries arising from the placement of a street light pole when such placement was a discretionary function and no exception to sovereign…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellant's vehicle left its lane and struck a street light pole on a highway divider. The pole was installed 20 years prior, and while design standar…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Discretionary Function Exception cases and more on FLexlaw
STONE, Judge.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the defendant-city. The essential facts are undisputed. Appellant was driving on a divided highway, at 45 m.p.h., when his vehicle left its lane of traffic for unknown reasons and collided with a street light pole located on a divider “island.” The island, located at an intersection, separated the through lanes from a separate left turn lane.
Appellant contends that the placement of the pole, 20 years earlier, created a known dangerous condition that was not readily apparent. See St. Petersburg v. Collom, 419 So. 2d 1082 (Fla.1982). Appellant further argues that even if the pole did not constitute a hidden danger, the city breached its duty to maintain the road in a reasonably safe condition.
The appellant does not contend that the pole was hidden or obscured from view in his lane of travel, nor was it constructed contrary to the road lighting construction plans. The roadway at that location is straight and flat. The initial installation did not violate the accepted standards at the time of construction, however, the requirements for design and placement of light poles have since changed.
After reviewing the record, we find no error in the trial court’s conclusion that the city is shielded by sovereign immunity because the placement of this pole was a discretionary, planning-level function and the facts do not fall within any recognized exception to the city’s exemption.
We therefore affirm. Cf. Department of Transp. v. Neilson, 419 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. 1982); Miller v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 508 So. 2d 1328 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); City of Delray Beach v. Watts, 461 So. 2d 142 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Barrera v. State Dept, of Transp., 470 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); State Dept, of Transp. v. Caf-fiero, 522 So. 2d 57 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Hyde v. Florida Dept, of Transp., 452 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Windham v. Florida Dept, of Transp., 476 So. 2d 735 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).
HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Dep't OF Transp. v. Neilson, 419 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. 1982)
- City OF ST. Petersburg v. Collom, 419 So. 2d 1082 (Fla. 1982)
- Barrera v. State, 470 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
- Windham v. Fla. Dep't of Transp., 476 So. 2d 735 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
- The City OF Delray Beach v. Shalanda Watts, 461 So. 2d 142 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
- State v. Caffiero, 522 So. 2d 57 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)
- Miller v. City OF Fort Lauderdale, 508 So. 2d 1328 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
- Collie Roger Gordon v. State, 452 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
- Hyde v. Fla. Dep't of Transp., 452 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)