LINDA KULMANN
v.
NATALIE RINALDI, ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A pro se plaintiff sought to pursue a federal court action that the magistrate judge determined lacked subject matter jurisdiction, either as an improper removal of a state probate proceeding or as a tort claim lacking diversity jurisdiction. The district court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation and dismissed the case without prejudice.
Federal courts lack subject matter jurisdiction over probate proceedings and estate administration. Additionally, the plaintiff failed to establish or allege facts supporting diversity jurisdiction for any tort claim. Accordingly, the case must be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
[1] Federal courts lack subject matter jurisdiction over probate proceedings or the administration of an estate.
[2] A federal court lacks jurisdiction over a state court probate proceeding.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“a federal court has no jurisdiction over probate proceedings or the administration of an estate”
Establishes the primary basis for dismissal—federal courts' complete lack of jurisdiction over probate matters
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceLinda Kulmann, proceeding pro se, filed a case and requested in forma pauperis status. A state court probate proceeding (Case No. PRC240000711) was pe…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Probate cases and more on FLexlaw
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (DE [22]) recommending that this cause be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Magistrate Judge conducted a screening of Plaintiff's claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and has determined that this Court lacks jurisdiction over the action. Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has conducted a de novo consideration of the matter.
It is unclear whether Plaintiff is attempting to remove a state court probate proceeding (Case No. PRC240000711) pending in the Circuit Court in Broward County, Florida, or whether she is seeking to pursue a claim for tortious interference with an expectancy of an inheritance. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that the Court lacks jurisdiction under either theory.
First, a federal court has no jurisdiction over probate proceedings or the administration of an estate. Markham v. Allen, 326 U.S. 490, 494 (1946). Second, if Plaintiff is attempting to assert a tort claim, she has failed to establish or allege facts supporting diversity jurisdiction. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (DE [22]) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case and DENY AS MOOT any pending motions.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 12th day of February 2026.
RAAG SINGHAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies furnished counsel via CM/ECF and by US Mail to:
Linda Kulmann, pro se
PO Box 125
Southbury CT 06488
2