FRANCISCO JUAREZ FARFAN
v.
PAMELA JO BONDI, ET AL.

S.D. Fla. | 2026-02-10
No. 1:26-cv-20777
2026 FFL 2364 District Court, S.D. Florida (2026)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that a habeas petition must be filed in the district of confinement, and where filed incorrectly, the case should be transferred in the interest of justice.


Headnotes

[1] Habeas petitions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. …

[2] A court that lacks jurisdiction over a civil action may transfer the action to any court that does have jurisdiction.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Habeas petitions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 generally must be filed in the judicial district where the petitioner is detained at the time of filing.”

Establishes the jurisdictional requirement that habeas corpus petitions under § 2241 must be filed in the district where the petitioner is confined.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Petitioner filed a habeas corpus petition in the Southern District of Florida, challenging his detention. Respondents moved to dismiss or transfer the…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

Petitioner brought his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241 and 2243 and Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a) Application for Preliminary Injunction (“Petition”) (ECF No. 1) in this Court on February 5, 2026. Therein, he challenges as unlawful his detention in the custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, as he is currently “detain[ed] at their Alligator Alcatraz detention center." Petition ¶ 2. Now, Respondents move to dismiss this Petition or, in the alternative, transfer it to the Middle District of Florida, as “Alligator Alcatraz” is located

in Collier County, which is in the Middle District of Florida. Resp. Mot. at 1. Petitioner states he does not oppose Respondents' Motion, and notes “the Petitioner was mistakenly filed in the Southern District of Florida when it should have been filed in the Middle District of Florida, where Petitioner is detained." Pet. Mot. at 2.

Habeas petitions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 generally must be filed in the judicial district where the petitioner is detained at the time of filing. See Trump v. J.G.G., 604 U.S. 670, 672 (2025) (“For 'core habeas petitions,' 'jurisdiction lies in only one district: the district of confinement.” (quoting Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 443 (2004))). Where a civil action is filed in a court that lacks jurisdiction to decide that action, that court may transfer the action to any court that does have jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1406, 1631; see also Dobard v. Johnson, 749 F. 2d 1503, 1506–07 (11th Cir. 1985).

Here, Petitioner acknowledges that he was detained at “Alligator Alcatraz," which is located in Collier County in the Middle District of Florida, at the time of filing his Petition. Petition ¶ 2; Pet. Mot. at 2. Therefore, this Court lacks jurisdiction to hear the Petition. Trump, 604 U.S. at 672. Rather than dismiss the Petition, the Court finds it is in the “interest of justice” to transfer the case to the Middle District of Florida, where it can properly be heard, rather than forcing Petitioner to refile his Petition and delay adjudication thereof. 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).

Accordingly, UPON CONSIDERATION of Petitioner's Motion, Respondents' Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise advised of the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to TRANSFER this action to the Fort Myers Division of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, and then to CLOSE this case. Petitioner's Motion (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED, and Respondents' Motion (ECF No. 4) is GRANTED IN PART.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 10th day of February, 2026.

K. MICHAEL MOORE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

c: All counsel of record

[fn 1]: Respondents in this case are Pamela Jo Bondi, in her official capacity as U.S. Attorney General; Kristi Noem, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; Todd Lyons, in his official capacity as the acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement; Garrett J. Ripa, in his capacity as the Field Office Director in Miami, Florida for Immigration and Customs Enforcement; and the Warden at Alligator Alcatraz Detention Center, in his official capacity. (ECF No. 1) ¶¶ 4–8.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw