ANGEL CAMPOS PAZ
v.
KELEI WALKER, ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Petitioner Angel Campos Paz challenged his detention as an "alien applicant for admission" under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A), arguing he should have been classified as a detainee under § 1226(a) entitled to a bond hearing. The court granted the habeas petition, finding the government's classification unlawful and requiring an individualized bond hearing.
Petitioner was being unlawfully detained due to improper classification under § 1225(b)(2)(A). His proper classification is as a detainee under § 1226(a), requiring an individualized bond hearing within 10 days.
[1] An alien discovered within the United States, who has been present for years prior to detention, is properly classified under 8 U.S.C. …
[2] Detention of aliens discovered within the United States under 8 U.S.C. …
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Defendants' recent reliance on § 1225(b)(2)(A) to detain noncitizens discovered within the United States upends decades of practice.”
Establishes that the government's classification approach contradicted long-established agency practice.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePetitioner was detained by immigration authorities and classified as "an alien who is an applicant for admission" under § 1225(b)(2)(A). The governmen…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Mandatory Detention cases and more on FLexlaw
This matter is before the Court upon the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [DE 1]. Upon consideration of the parties' submissions, the pertinent portions of the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that Petitioner is being unlawfully detained due to his improper classification as “an alien who is an applicant for admission” pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A). The Court finds that Petitioner's proper classification is a detainee pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). See Castanon-Nava v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 161 F. 4th 1048, 1062 (7th Cir. 2025) (noting that "Defendants' recent reliance on § 1225(b)(2)(A) to detain noncitizens discovered within the United States upends decades of practice. ‘Before July 8, 2025, DHS's longstanding interpretation had been that § 1226(a) applied to those who have crossed the border between ports of entry and are shortly thereafter apprehended.” Hasan v. Crawford, 800 F. Supp. 3d 641, 657 (E.D. Va. 2025) (citation modified). Mandatory detention of all persons illegally in the United States only became official DHS policy when Acting Director of ICE Todd M. Lyons issued an internal memorandum on July 8, 2025, explaining that the agency “revisited its legal position" on the applicability of §§ 1225(b) and 1226(a). Id. (citation omitted)), see also Gonzalez v. Sec'y, Dep't of Homeland Sec., No. 2:25-CV-1047-KCD-DNF, 2025 WL 3677101, at *1 (M.D.
Fla. 2025) (finding that federal regulations provide that aliens detained within the United States who have been here for years before their detention are entitled under § 1226(a) to receive a bond hearing at the outset of their detention.). Accordingly, it is,
ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [DE 1] is GRANTED:
1. Within 10 days of the date of this Order, Respondents shall provide Petitioner an individualized bond hearing consistent with 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a).
2. Respondents are enjoined from denying bond to Petitioner on the basis that he is detained pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2).
3. Respondents shall, within 24 hours of the bond hearing, file a status report indicating the outcome of the bond hearing and, if release on bond is denied, the reason(s) for the denial.
4. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.
5. This case is CLOSED.
DONE and ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 12th day of January, 2026.