MUNIZ
v.
PRIMARY MEDICAL STAFFING INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the parties are compelled to arbitrate the claims and the action is stayed pending arbitration.
Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendant. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to stay and compel arbitration. The Magistr…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Report And Recommendation cases and more on FLexlaw
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or Alternative to Stay and to Compel Arbitration [DE 6], and the September 11, 2025 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt (the “Report”) [DE 14]. The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 14] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 14] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F. 2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F. 2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993).
Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 14] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusions.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The Report [DE 14] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 2. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or Alternative to Stay and to Compel Arbitration [DE 6] is GRANTED; 3. The parties are hereby COMPELLED to arbitrate the claims Plaintiff pled in the Complaint; 4. This action is hereby STAYED pending arbitration; 5. The Clerk is DIRECTED to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case and DENY AS MOOT any pending motions. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida this 26th day of September, 2025.
fl } “a 4 : “4 if % f ? f tne i ye Zo #4 v Paty 4 ‘4 ase Af
CA MAGIA AYN GC
VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS
United States District Judge Copies to: Counsel of record Magistrate Judge Hunt
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- LoCONTE v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745 (11th Cir. 1988)
- Resolution Tr. Corp. v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144 (11th Cir. 1993)
- LoConte v. Dugger, 488 U.S. 958 (U.S. 1988)