NDIMBIE
v.
SOUTHWEST HAMMOCKS, LLLP.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This is a District Court order in the Southern District of Florida adopting a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and dismissing Plaintiff Ndimbie's action against Southwest Hammocks, LLLP and Crossroads Management without prejudice.
The District Court adopted and approved the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, dismissed the action without prejudice, and denied as moot Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.
“As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge's factual findings in the Report [DE 9] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion.”
Establishes that the absence of timely objections results in adoption of the Magistrate Judge's findings without de novo review requirement
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe opinion does not provide detailed facts, as it adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report without discussion of factual details. The case involves Ndimb…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Report And Recommendation Adoption cases and more on FLexlaw
and CROSSROADS MANAGEMENT,,
Defendant. _____________________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING AND APPROVING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE; CLOSING CASE
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Strauss (the “Report”) [DE 9], issued on July 24, 2025, and Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [DE 3]. The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 9] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 9] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F. 2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F. 2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 9] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusions. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report [DE 9] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 3. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed Jn Forma Pauperis [DE 5] is DENIED AS MOOT;
4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 12th day of August, 2025.
fl } “a 4 : “t jf f ? f yf Zo #4 v Paty 4 ‘4 ase Af
CA KAAYAA AVY EINE
VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS
United States District Judge Copies to: Counsel of Record Magistrate Judge Jared Strauss
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- LoCONTE v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745 (11th Cir. 1988)
- Resolution Tr. Corp. v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144 (11th Cir. 1993)
- LoConte v. Dugger, 488 U.S. 958 (U.S. 1988)