LEON DAVIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MILLS, Judge.
Davis appeals the summary denial of his motion pursuant to Rule 3.850, Fla.R. Crim.P. alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. Although the trial judge states in his final order that certain portions of the record conclusively showing that Davis is entitled to no relief are attached thereto, no such attachment was made nor do the enumerated documents appear elsewhere in the record now before this court. We therefore reverse the order denying Davis’s motion and remand for either attachment of those portions of the record conclusively showing no entitlement to relief or for further proceedings pursuant to Rule 3.850.
Reversed and remanded.
SMITH, C.J., and NIMMONS, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sheley v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 703 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)…court explained in Griffith v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 485 So. 2d 818 (Fla.1986), that review of Parole Commission orders was still available by mandamus or habeas corpus.2 See also Florida Parole and Probation Commission v. Dornau, 534 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). The district courts of appeal subsequently decided that a petition for writ of mandamus seeking review of a Parole Commission order should be directed to the circuit court. See Johnson v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission,…
-
Johnson v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 543 So. 2d 875 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)…983). Therefore, review of PPRDs set by the Florida Parole and Probation Commission are proper via the extraordinary writ of mandamus. Griffith v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission. See also Florida Parole and Probation Commission v. Dornau, 534 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 1st [*876] DCA 1988). However, since the circuit courts have concurrent extraordinary writs jurisdiction with the district courts, we have concluded that the circuit court is the proper forum in which to file a petition for writ of mandamus to…
-
Robert E. Banks v. Jones, 197 So. 3d 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)…ate’s claim that an Effective Parole Release Date has been improperly set, which can more likely affect an inmate’s opportunity for release from prison, can be asserted by petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm’n v. Dornau, 534 So. 2d 789, 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) (citing Griffith v. Fla. Parole & [*1168] Prob. Comm’n, 485 So. 2d 818 (Fla.1986), and noting that “judicial review is available only through the common law writs of mandamus, for review of [Presumptive Parole Release Dates]…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence