ISRAEL TOMAS MARQUEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1988-11-29
No. 88-518
Before HUBBART, DANIEL S. PEARSON, and FERGUSON, JJ.
534 So. 2d 815 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1988) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Topics
Credit For Time Served Concurrent Sentences

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Credit For Time Served cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

A sentencing pursuant to agreements that gave credit for all time served and orders that the sentence was to run concurrent with a sentence imposed in a different county for different offenses does not include, as a matter of law, a credit for time served in the other jurisdiction. Besides, it is clear from the record of the plea colloquy that the appellant was to receive credit only for the time served in Dade County. The State concedes, however, that the time served in Dade County was forty-two rather than the thirty-two days credited.

The remaining points in this pro se appeal are either without merit or are not reviewable by appeal of the sentencing order. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for correction of the sentence in accordance with the confession of error.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Tonnessen v. State, 688 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Horton v. State, 684 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Marquez v. State, 534 So. 2d 815 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988),…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw