JULIUS SALOMON, AS ASSIGNEE OF THOMAS J. TAYLOR; BELKNAP HARDWARE & MANUFACTURING COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND HARGADINE-MCKITTRICK DRY GOODS COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,
v.
THOMAS J. TAYLOR, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This case involves an appeal by two corporations, Belknap Hardware Company and Hargadine-McKittrick Dry Goods Company, who appealed a decree without a clear record of their involvement as parties in the lower court proceedings. The Florida Supreme Court dismissed their appeal due to a lack of proper party status.
No, the corporations did not have standing to appeal because the record did not demonstrate they were parties to the suit or had any interest in its subject matter.
“The only decree in the record is one entered in a suit between the said Taylor and the said Salomon, as Assignee alone.”
Establishes the limited scope of the decree found in the record.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceTwo corporations, Belknap Hardware & Manufacturing Company and Hargadine-McKittrick Dry Goods Company, appealed a decree entered in a suit between Tho…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Per Curiam.
.Belknap Hardware Company and Hargadine-McKittrick Dry Goods Company, sued out this appeal on July 30, 1904, in their own name and in the name of Julius Salomon, as Assignee of Thomas J. Taylor, from a decree of the date of February 9, 1904, purporting to have been made in a suit wherein the said Taylor was complainant and the said Salomon as Assignee and the Said corporations were defendants. The only decree in the record is one entered in a suit between the said Taylor and the said Salomon, as Assignee alone. There is nothing in the record prior in time to the entry of the appeal to show that the corporations were, or even offered to become parties to the suit, nor that they had any interest in the subject matter of the suit, as privies or otherwise: and the appeal is, therefore, dismissed at their cost.
All the Justices concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
SR Acquisitions-Florida City, LLC v. SAN Remo Homes AT Fla. City, LLC, 78 So. 3d 636 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)…R. Civ. P. 1.540(b) (providing that the court may relieve “a party, or a party’s legal representative ” from a judgment, decree, or order) (emphasis added). A non party with no interest in the case cannot challenge a judgment. See Salomon v. Taylor, 50 Fla. 608, 30 So. 48 (Fla.1905); Jaffer v. Miami Beach Redev. Agency, 392 So. 2d 1305 (Fla.1980) (denying appellate relief to a non party). Although parties are not automatically entitled to entry of a stipulated judgment, if a trial court delays ruling upon…
-
Hope v. Lipkin, 156 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963)…o. 257. Counsel for the wife have attempted to take an appeal in their individual names and not on behalf of the wife. Never having been parties of record in the trial court, they have no standing to prosecute such an appeal. See: Salomon v. Taylor, 50 Fla. 608, 39 So. 48; King v. Brown, Fla.1951, 55 So. 2d 187; 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals, § 55. Therefore, same is hereby dismissed, Dismissed.…
-
State v. Simon, 492 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…ioning committee. This being so, we conclude that HRS is not a party to this proceeding and has no standing to perfect an appeal from these orders. See, e.g., Jaffer v. Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency, 392 So. 2d 1305 (Fla.1980); Salomon v. Taylor, 50 Fla. 608, 39 So. 48 (1905); Transportation Management Co. v. Druck, 279 So. 2d 88 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973), aff'd. in part and rev’d. in part on other grounds sub nom. Goodfriend v. Druck, 289 So. 2d 710 (Fla.1974); Buchanan v. Jimenez, 155 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 3d DC…