BARBARO R. MOREIRAS, APPELLANT,

v.

ANA M. MOREIRAS, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Cunningham v. Anchor Hocking Corp., 558 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
  …formation as well as to indicate generally the type of information held by the person listed, [emphasis added] See Florida Power & Light Co. v. Limeburner, 390 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). The rule is stated in Dade County School Board v. Soler, 534 So. 2d 884, 885 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), as follows: Although a party may be ordered to provide the names and addresses of individuals who have furnished statements in anticipation of litigation, “absent rare and exceptional circumstances,” Surf Drugs, Inc. v. Ver…
• State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Valido, 662 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
  …ates were protected by the work product privilege. See Surf Drugs, Inc. v. Vermette, 236 So. 2d 108 (Fla.1970); Waste Management, Inc. of Florida v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 544 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Dade County School Bd. v. Soler, 534 So. 2d 884 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Certiorari granted.…
• Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Weeks, 696 So. 2d 855 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)
  …en no showing of the “rare and exceptional circumstances” necessary to authorize the trial court’s order requiring Wal-Mart to produce the statements. See Surf Drugs, Inc. v. Vermette, 236 So. 2d 108, 113 (Fla.1970); Dade County School Bd. v. Soler, 534 So. 2d 884, 885 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). However, the trial court correctly held that Wal-Mart may be compelled to provide the names and addresses of individuals who have furnished statements in anticipation of litigation. See Cunningham v. Anchor Hocking Corp., 55…

Authorities Cited

• Goldman v. Dithrich, 131 Fla. 408 (Fla. 1938)
• Young v. de Garcia, 172 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)