ALONSO CANO
v.
245 C&C, LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The district court adopted a magistrate judge's report and recommendation denying defendants' contempt motion as moot in this case involving claims by Alonso Cano and his family against 245 C&C, LLC and CFH GROUP, LLC.
The Court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and denied Defendants' Contempt Motion as moot.
“Failure to file objections shall bar parties from attacking on appeal the factual findings contained in the report.”
Establishes the procedural consequence of not timely objecting to the magistrate judge's recommendations in the district court.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceCarlos A. Alonso Cano, individually and as guardian for his son, along with family members Angie Alonso Morejon, Katy Alonso Morejon, Jany Leidy Alons…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion For Contempt cases and more on FLexlaw
CARLOS A. ALONSO CANO, individually and as guardian for his son, ANGIE ALONSO MOREJON, KATY ALONSO MOREJON, JANY LEIDY ALONSO MOREJON, and FE MOREJON FERNANDEZ individually, Plaintiffs,
v.
245 C & C, LLC and CFH GROUP, LLC, Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis, (“Report,” D.E. 830), issued on October 25, 2024, recommending the Court deny Defendants' Contempt Motion (D.E. 787) as moot. The Report provides the Parties with fourteen (14) days to file objections. As of the date of this Order, no objections have been filed. Failure to file objections shall bar parties from attacking on appeal the factual findings contained in the report. See Resolution Trust Corp. v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F. 2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). Therefore, after an independent review of the Report and record, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (D.E. 830) is ADOPTED; and
2. Defendants' Contempt Motion (D.E. 787) is DENIED as moot.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 14th day of November, 2024.
Joan A. Lenard JOAN A. LENARD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Resolution Tr. Corp. v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144 (11th Cir. 1993)