BRITO
v.
LE JEUNE - DOUGLAS INDUSTRIAL PARK, LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court approved a settlement agreement between Brito and Le Jeune-Douglas Industrial Park, LLC, ordering the parties to file a notice or stipulation of dismissal and related documents by May 30, 2024, with dismissal without prejudice if they fail to comply.
The court ordered the parties to file either a Notice of Dismissal or Stipulation of Dismissal, along with a proposed Order of Dismissal or Final Judgment, by May 30, 2024, or face automatic dismissal without prejudice.
“The parties shall file either a Notice of Dismissal (if the Defendant has not served an answer or motion for summary judgment) or a Stipulation of Dismissal (signed by all parties who have appeared in this action), which must be filed with the Clerk of the Court”
The court's directive establishing the procedural requirements for finalizing the settlement
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe parties submitted a Joint Notice of Settlement indicating they had resolved their dispute. The case involved Brito as plaintiff and Le Jeune-Dougl…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the parties' Joint Notice of Settlement, (ECF No. 21), which states that the parties have settled this case. Accordingly, it is:
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The parties shall file either a Notice of Dismissal (if the Defendant has not served an answer or motion for summary judgment) or a Stipulation of Dismissal (signed by all parties who have appeared in this action), which must be filed with the Clerk of the Court; a proposed Order of Dismissal or Final Judgment; and any other documents necessary to conclude this action on or before May 30, 2024. See Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F. 3d 1272, 1280 (11th Cir. 2012).
2. If the parties fail to comply with this Order, the Court shall dismiss this case without prejudice without any further warning.
3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to DENY ALL PENDING MOTIONS AS MOOT.
4. The Clerk shall ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case for statistical purposes only. This shall not affect the substantive rights of the parties.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 30 day of April, 2024.
JOSE E/MARTINEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies provided to: All Counsel of Record