THOMAS A. MORGAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Morgan appeals his 24-month community control sentence, challenging 36 points added to his sentencing scoresheet for 'severe victim injury.' The court holds that these points should not have been included because Morgan's own battery caused no injury, and he was acquitted of the aggravated battery charge that actually caused the victim's injuries.
The court holds that the 36 victim injury points should not have been included because victim injury points are scored only if injury is an element of the offense of conviction, Morgan's battery caused no injury, and Morgan was acquitted of the aggravated battery charge that actually caused Haugstatter's injuries.
[1] Victim injury points shall not be scored if the injury is the result of a crime for which the defendant has been acquitted.
[2] Victim injury points may not be assessed against a defendant for injuries not caused by the defendant's actions.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Victim injury shall be scored if it is an element of any offense at conviction.”
Statement of the sentencing guideline rule that controlled at the time of Morgan's offense
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMorgan was stopped for speeding and appearing intoxicated. When Officer Haugstatter attempted to arrest Morgan, Morgan punched the officer in the ches…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Victim Injury Scoring cases and more on FLexlaw
SHARP, Chief Judge.
Morgan appeals his 24 month community control sentence on the ground that the 36 points added to his sentencing scoresheet for “severe victim injury” should not have been included. Absent the controverted 36 points, Morgan’s score would have placed him in the presumptive sentence bracket of “any non-state prison sanction.” We agree they should not have been included.
Appellant was charged with being a principal to battery on a law enforcement officer 1 (one Edward Haugstatter), and being a principal to aggravated battery on the same officer, by striking him with a deadly weapon.2 The proofs at trial established that Morgan was stopped by Officer Haug-statter because he was speeding and he appeared to be drunk. When the officer sought to arrest Morgan, Morgan punched him in the chest. Haugstatter wrestled Morgan to the ground and was in the process of handcuffing him when Harris, a passenger in Morgan’s car, grabbed Haug-statter’s flashlight and hit Haugstatter over the head with it, causing severe injury. Haugstatter was able to hold Harris and Morgan at gun point until help arrived.
The only injury which Haugstatter received resulted from Harris’ blow with the flashlight. But there was no evidence that Morgan was involved in Harris’ attack on Haugstatter, and no proof that either spoke to the other or planned Harris’ actions. As a result, the trial judge granted Morgan’s motion for judgment of acquittal as to the aggravated battery count. The jury found Morgan guilty of the battery on a law enforcement officer charge.
At the time the offense was committed, (February 19, 1987), sentencing guideline rule 3.701.d.7. provided: “Victim injury shall be scored if it is an element of any offense at conviction.” Victim injury does not appear to be a necessary element of the battery offense for which Morgan was convicted, although theoretically, the battery could have resulted in injury to Haugstatter. See Moore v. State, 469 So. 2d 947 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), quashed on other grounds, 489 So. 2d 1130 (Fla.1986); Worling v. State, 484 So. 2d 94 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).
Even if victim injury points can be assessed in a case for a battery which causes victim injury, it is clear that in this case, Morgan’s battery caused no injury. Further, he was acquitted on the aggravated battery charge, which in fact caused Haug-statter’s injuries. Under these circumstances, assessing any victim injury points against Morgan is not justified under rule 3.701.d.7.3 Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.
VACATE SENTENCE; REMAND.
DAUKSCH, J., concurs.
ORFINGER, J., concurs in result only.
. §§ 784.07(2) and 777.011, Fla.Stat. (1987).
. §§ 784.045(1)00 and 777.011, Fla.Stat. (1987).
. Although not controlling in this case, we note the result comports with the 1987 revision of rule 3.701.d.7. and its Committee Note, which states:
Victim injury shall be scored for each victim physically injured during a criminal episode or transaction.
Committee Note:
(d)(7) This provision implements the intention of the commission that points for victim injury be added for each victim injured during a criminal transaction or episode. The injury need not be an element of the crime for which the defendant is convicted, but is limited to physical trauma. However, if the victim injury is the result of a crime for which the defendant has been acquitted, it shall not be scored, (emphasis added)
See Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure Re Sentencing Guidelines, 509 So. 2d 1088, 1089-1090 (Fla.1987).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Johnson v. State, 583 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)…ffenses); Harris v. State, 513 So. 2d 169 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987) (points for victim injury were properly assessed when the defendant was convicted of felony murder, even though the evidence established that he was not the trigger man). Morgan v. State, 534 So. 2d 1239 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988), upon which appellant relies, is distinguishable because the defendant in that case was acquitted of aggravated battery arising out of an incident in which an officer was hit with a flashlight by his companion. The only injury re…
-
Clementa Leaford Johnson v. State, 700 So. 2d 151 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)…ense, or any offense other than the primary offense, for which an offender is convicted and which is pending before the court for sentencing at the time of the primary offense.” § 921.0011(7), Fla. Stat. (1995). Defendant relies on Morgan v. State, 534 So. 2d 1239, 1240 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988), for the proposition that points for severe victim injury should not have been added to the score-sheet. In that case, Morgan had been stopped for speeding and appeared to be drunk. He punched the officer in the chest when…
-
State v. Kirkland, 818 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Morgan v. State, 534 So. 2d 1239 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). THOMPSON, C.J., SHARP, W., and PALMER, J.J., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- FLA. RULES OF CRIM. PROCEDURE RE SENTENCING GUIDELINES (RULES 3.701 & 3.988), 509 So. 2d 1088 (Fla. 1987)
- Moore v. State, 469 So. 2d 947 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)
- Worling v. State, 484 So. 2d 94 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986)
- State v. Moore, 489 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. 1986)
- Boehmer v. State, 489 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. 1986)