HENRY C. TIMS, APPELLANT,
v.
J.D. FOLSOM, AND RICHARD L. DUGGER, APPELLEES
HENRY C. TIMS, APPELLANT,
J.D. FOLSOM, AND RICHARD L. DUGGER, APPELLEES
535 So. 2d 301
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We find the circumstances of this case appear to be controlled by the rule pronounced by this court in Mayo v. Dugger, 535 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), On Motion for Rehearing and Clarification. Accordingly, the order denying appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus is reversed, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings.
JOANOS, WIGGINTON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Henderson v. State, 543 So. 2d 344 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)…cle I, section 9, clause 3, of the United States Constitution, being procedural in nature and not creating substantive rights. See Blankenship v. Dugger, 521 So. 2d 1097 (Fla.1988); Mayo v. Dugger, 535 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Tims v. Folsom, 535 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Dobbert v. Florida, 432 U.S. 282, 97 S.Ct. 2290, 53 [*346] L.Ed.2d 344 (1977). Rule 33-19.001(3) provides: An offender shall be considered amenable for treatment if he or she is an individual with a psycho sexual disorder who i…
Authorities Cited
- Mayo v. Dugger, 535 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)