DOROTHY KENDRICKS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DOROTHY KENDRICKS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
535 So. 2d 354
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1988)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The mandate heretofore issued in this case is withdrawn and appellant’s motion for an extension of time within which to file a motion for rehearing is granted.
The sole issue raised on appeal was that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion for arrest of judgment. The motion for arrest of judgment was not timely filed. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.
BOOTH, SHIVERS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Robinson v. State, 610 So. 2d 1288 (Fla. 1992)…predicate facts could be established, the laboratory employees could testify. [*1291] Now, Robinson argues that the trial court erred both in denying the continuance and in admitting the DNA testimony. We disagree. Robinson relies on Hill v. State, 535 So. 2d 354 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988), in which the district court held that a continuance should have been granted where the defense was allowed, for the first time, to interview and depose witnesses about DNA testing results the day before trial. Hill, however, is…
-
Griffin v. State, 598 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)…discretion in that court found witness to be necessary for proper defense, despite fact that appellant had three months prior to trial to locate this witness yet waited until four days before trial to move for issuance of a subpoena); Hill v. State, 535 So. 2d 354, 355 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988) (“fairness, state and federal constitutional due process rights and the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure require that witnesses be disclosed and made available to a defendant in a criminal case in sufficient time to permi…