PAPINO
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting the request for attorney's fees.
Plaintiff sought attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The Magistrate Judge recommended granting the request as authorized and reason…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Report And Recommendation cases and more on FLexlaw
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (D.E. 38), AND GRANTING RICHARD A. CULBERTSON’S UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO CHARGE A REASONABLE FEE (D.E. 36)
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis’s Report and Recommendations, (“Report,” D.E. 38), filed June 5, 2023, recommending that the Court grant Richard A. Culbertson’s Unopposed Request for Authorization to Charge a Reasonable Fee, (D.E. 36). Specifically, Judge Louis found that the fee request is authorized by law and reasonable. (Report at 3.) The Report provides the Parties with fourteen (14) days to file objections. As of the date of this Order, no objections have been filed. Failure to file objections shall bar parties from attacking on appeal the factual findings contained in the report. See Resolution Trust Corp. v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F. 2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). Therefore, after an independent review of the Report and record, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (D.E. 38) issued
on June 5, 2023, is ADOPTED; 2. Richard A. Culbertson’s Unopposed Request for Authorization to Charge a Reasonable Fee (D.E. 36) is GRANTED; and 3. Plaintiff shall have and receive from Defendant $6,241.58 in attorneys’ fees—in addition to the $10,095.92 in attorneys’ fees previously awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act, (see D.E. 35)—for which sum let execution issue. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 21st day of June, 2023.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Resolution Tr. Corp. v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144 (11th Cir. 1993)