MARK JOLLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MARK JOLLEY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
535 So. 2d 715
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED on the authority of Bentley v. State, 411 So. 2d 1361 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 419 So. 2d 1195 (Fla.1982).
DAUKSCH, COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
R.M.A. v. J.A.S., 269 So. 3d 649 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)…"findings that would support allowing the Husband to pay the attorney's fee award in two installments over a one-year period"). The repayment period must be reasonable based upon the parties' respective financial conditions. See, e.g., Hood v. Hood, 535 So. 2d 715, 715 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) ("The trial court abused its discretion in allowing the husband a seven[-]year payment period, especially in light of the husband's financial affidavit reflecting net assets of over $117,000 and a weekly income of over $1,10…
-
Wright v. Wright, 965 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)…because “use and possession of the home had been awarded to the wife until the youngest child attains the age of eighteen years,” payment of the former wife’s attorney’s fees could not be made from the funds from the sale of the home); Hood v. Hood, 535 So. 2d 715, 715 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) (holding that “[t]he trial court abused its discretion in allowing the husband a seven[-]year payment period”); Urbieta v. Urbieta, 469 So. 2d 930, 931 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (holding that trial court abused its discretion in it…
Authorities Cited
- Bentley v. State, 411 So. 2d 1361 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)