LIVING TREE LABORATORIES, LLC.
v.
UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court granted the motion for a charging order, affirming the magistrate judge's recommendation.
Judgment creditors filed a motion for a charging order against a debtor's membership interests in a limited liability company. The magistrate judge re…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Charging Order cases and more on FLexlaw
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis’ Report and Recommendations (the “Report”) [ECF No. 352] regarding Judgment Creditors United Healthcare Services, Inc., OptumInsight, Inc., United Behavioral Health, Inc., and UnitedHealth Group, Inc.’s Motion for Charging Order Against Moshe Dunoff’s Membership Interests in Dunoff Holdings, LLC (the “Motion”) [ECF No. 347]. The Court referred the Motion to Judge Louis for a ruling pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. [ECF Nos. 35, 223, 327].
On November 11, 2022, Judge Louis issued her Report recommending that the Motion be granted. No objections were filed. A district court may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Those portions of the report and recommendation to which objections are made are accorded de novo review if those objections “pinpoint the specific findings that the party disagrees with.” United States v. Schultz, 565 F. 3d 1353, 1360 (11th Cir. 2009); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Any portions of the report and recommendation to which no specific objections are made are reviewed only for clear error. Liberty Am. Ins. Grp., Inc. v. WestPoint
Underwriters, L.L.C., 199 F. Supp. 2d 1271, 1276 (M.D. Fla. 2001); accord Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Having reviewed the Report for clear error, the Court agrees with Judge Louis’ wellreasoned analysis and conclusions that the Motion should be granted and that a charging order should be issued. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis’ Report and Recommendations, [ECF No. 352], is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED and incorporated into this Order by reference. 2. Judgment Creditors’ Motion for Charging Order Against Moshe Dunoff’s
Membership Interests in Dunoff Holdings, LLC, [ECF No. 347], is GRANTED.
3. Any and all interests of Moshe Dunoff in Dunoff Holdings (the “Interests”) are subject to this Charging Order for the benefit of the Judgment Creditors.
4. The Interests are charged with payment of the Judgment with interest and shall not be transferred except for payment of the Judgment, until the Judgment is paid in full.
5. Any and all distributions, transfers, amounts owed and/or payable to Moshe Dunoff, by or on behalf of Dunoff Holdings, shall be paid to the Judgment Creditors c/o their counsel in this action, Landau Law, PLLC, 3010 N. Military Trail, Suite 318, Boca Raton, Florida 33431.
6. Moshe Dunoff will be discharged from his obligation to the Judgment Creditors to the extent of any amounts so paid to the Judgment Creditors, until all amounts owed pursuant to the Judgment are paid in full.
7. This Charging Order shall remain binding on the Interests until such further order of this Court. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 29th day of November, 2022.
DARRIN P. GAYLE
UNITED STATES RICT JUDGE
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353 (11th Cir. 2009)
- Liberty Am. Ins. Grp., Inc. v. Westpoint Underwriters, L.L.C., 2001 WL 1850837 (M.D. Fla. 2001)