REEF AZUL, LLC
v.
POTTER
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, denying the Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions.
Plaintiff filed a Motion for Sanctions. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation. No objections were filed by the Plaintiff.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Objections To Report And Recommendation cases and more on FLexlaw
MAGISTRATE JUDGE [DE 39]; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS [DE 25]
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927 [DE 25], and the August 22, 2022 Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) [DE 39]. The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 39] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 39] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F. 2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F. 2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993).
Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 39] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusions.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report [DE 39] is ADOPTED and APPROVED; and 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927 [DE 25] is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 7th day of September, 2022.
f a ? ; 2 (F a “4 if { FO etre zd a3 v ty j ‘4 ta ase Af
VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS
United States District Judge Copies to: Counsel of Record Magistrate Judge McCabe
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- LoCONTE v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745 (11th Cir. 1988)
- Resolution Tr. Corp. v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144 (11th Cir. 1993)
- LoConte v. Dugger, 488 U.S. 958 (U.S. 1988)