JOHN ANGUS WRIGHT, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Emilienne Pierre v. State, 606 So. 2d 502 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)
  …ion of the primary offense, since the arrest warrant for the worthless check offense had not yet been executed. Nor was there any evidence that defendant had failed to appear at a court hearing. These facts are determinative. In Marshalek v. State, 536 So. 2d 1072 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), the trial court scored legal constraint points based on outstanding warrants for defendant’s failure to appear on two traffic charges. At the sentencing hearing, defendant introduced copies of county court orders subsequently re…
• Kinman v. State, 550 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)
  …Kinman failed to attend the hearings, or that warrants were issued for his arrest. Points for legal constraint may be assessed for having outstanding warrants based on traffic offenses when a defendant commits a crime. See e.g. Marshalek v. State, 536 So. 2d 1072 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). However, the state must establish those salient facts with competent evidence. Here it failed to do so. There is no evidence that Kinman failed to appear at any of the hearings, or that any warrant was issued and was outstanding…
• Wright v. Sec'y FOR THE Dep't OF Corr., 278 F.3d 1245 (11th Cir. 2002)
  …ellate court affirmed Wright’s convictions and the sentences on the armed robbery counts, but remanded for clarification as to whether the sentence on the attempted felony murder count was to be served concurrently or consecutively. Wright v. State, 536 So. 2d 1072 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1988). On remand, the trial court clarified that Wright’s sentence on the attempted murder count was to be served concurrently with his life sentence on the armed robbery count. On April 21, 1991, Wright filed a pro se motion for po…

  ← 1 / 2 →