GARCIA
v.
SEDANOS MARKET, INC.

S.D. Fla. | 2021-07-01
No. 19-22014-CIV
District Court, S.D. Florida (2021)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the relevant time period for FLSA claims is two to three years prior to the complaint filing, and the plaintiff may amend the complaint to substitute proper defendants, with the amendment relating back to the original filing.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff filed an FLSA claim for failure to pay overtime. The parties raised issues regarding the applicable statute of limitations and the plaintiff…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

1. The relevant time period for the Plaintiff's FLSA claims are 2 years prior to May 17, 2019 and 3 years prior to May 17, 2019, if the Plaintiff proves reckless disregard for the FLSA provisions. 2. Defendants Lierganes Enterprises, Inc., and/or Suanes Enterprises, Inc., will be substituted by interlineation with Defendant Sedano’s Market Inc. DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 1st day of July, 2021. Zh , .

PATRICIA A. SEITZ

UNITED STATES SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Ce: All counsel of record

1 The Parties shall advise the Court if newly named Defendants shall be designated as d/b/a Sedano’s Market.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw