SILAGYI
v.
TOWRISS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, denying the Plaintiffs' motion for attorney's fees and costs.
Plaintiffs filed motions for attorney's fees and costs. A Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation addressing these motions. No objections …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Report And Recommendation Review cases and more on FLexlaw
MAGISTRATE JUDGE; DENYING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ Motion for Adjudication of Entitlement to Attorney’s Fees and Costs [DE 5]; Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees [DE 27]; and the March 11, 2021 Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) [DE 30]. The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 30] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 30] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F. 2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F. 2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 30] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusions.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report [DE 30] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 2. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees [DE’s 5, 27] is hereby DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 30th day of March, 2021.
, ? “4 i} 3 i Ye ea a4 v if /f ta ae it
VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS
United States District Judge Copies furnished to: Magistrate Judge Snow Counsel of record
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- LoCONTE v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745 (11th Cir. 1988)
- Resolution Tr. Corp. v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144 (11th Cir. 1993)
- LoConte v. Dugger, 488 U.S. 958 (U.S. 1988)