JOHN FANNING, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOHN FANNING, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
537 So. 2d 197
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1989)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in imposing court costs and attorney fees without notice or the opportunity to be heard. Jenkins v. State, 444 So. 2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike the cost provision without prejudice to the state to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. The judgments and sentences are affirmed in all other respects.
RYDER, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Morgan Eugene Ayers v. State, 538 So. 2d 545 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)…n of probation. Mays v. State, 519 So. 2d 618 (Fla.1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So. 2d 947 (Fla.1984). Consequently, we strike the cost provision without prejudice to the State to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. Fanning v. State, 537 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). AFFIRMED, in part, REVERSED, in part, and REMANDED, for further proceedings. WENTWORTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.…
-
Christie v. State, 538 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)…utes, without notice or the opportunity to object. Jenkins v. State, 444 So. 2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike the cost provisions without [*545] prejudice to the State to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. Fanning v. State, 537 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). WENTWORTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Jenkins v. State, 444 So. 2d 947 (Fla. 1984)