SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
v.
1 GLOBAL CAPITAL LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Court granted the Receiver's Sixth Application for Allowance and Payment of Fees and Expenses, approving the requested amounts for legal and professional services.
The Receiver filed an application for fees and expenses incurred by his counsel, accountants, and a Canadian firm assisting with service of process. T…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Receiver’s Sixth Application for Allowance and Payment of Fees and Expenses, ECF No. (“Sixth Application”), filed on September 22, 2020. The Sixth Application seeks an award of legal and professional fees and the reimbursement of certain expenses incurred on behalf of the Receiver for services rendered by (1) Nelson Mullins Broad and Cassel (“NMBC”) for work performed by the Receiver and his counsel; (2) Kapila Mukamal (“Kapila”), the Receiver’s accountants; and (3) Dickinson Wright LLP (“Dickinson”), a Canadian firm assisting with service of process on several Canadian entities. The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) does not object to the payment of fees and costs sought in the Sixth Application. Further, no other objections were filed within the time required to do so, which has now expired, nor has the Court received any requests for extensions of time within which to file such objections. The Sixth Application covers work performed from March 21, 2020, through July 31, 2020. It seeks approval of a total award in the amount of $200,406.71. This total award is comprised of the following amounts: (a) $166,793.15 in legal fees and costs to NMBC for work performed and costs incurred by the Receiver and his counsel; (b) $30,234.10 in professional fees and costs to Kapila, the Receiver’s accountants; and (c) $3,379.46 in professional fees to Dickinson, a Canadian firm assisting with service of process on several Canadian entities. The Receiver, NMBC, and Kapila have agreed to a 20% hold back of their professional fees. Taking into account the 20% hold back of professional fees for NMBC and Kapila, the Sixth Application seeks approval for disbursements in the amounts of $133,528.15 to the Receiver and his counsel,
$24,241.60 to Kapila, and $3,379.46 to Dickinson. The Court has reviewed the fee application and the supporting billing information. Moreover, the Court has considered the relevant factors for making a determination on an award of attorneys’ fees incurred during a receivership — namely, (1) the time and labor required; (2) the novelty and difficulty of the question involved; (3) the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly; (4) the likelihood, if apparent to the client, that the acceptance of the particular employment will preclude other employment by the lawyer; (5) the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services; (6) whether the fee is fixed or contingent; (7) the time limitations imposed by the client or by the circumstances; (8) the amount involved and the results obtained; (9) the experience, reputation, and ability of the lawyer or lawyers performing the services; (10)
the “undesirability” of the case; (11) the nature and length of the professional relationship with the Case No. 18-cv-61991-BLOOM/Valle
client; and (12) any awards in similar cases. In re Norman v. Housing Auth. of City of Montgomery, 836 F. 2d 1292 (11th Cir. 1988). In light of these factors, the Court finds that the time spent during this billing period is reasonable and approves of the hourly rates charged. Therefore, the Court concludes that the amounts sought in the Sixth Application represent reasonable compensation for actual and necessary services rendered and expenses incurred on the Recetver’s behalf. Accordingly, itis ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Receiver’s Sixth Application for Allowance and Payment of Fees and Expenses, ECF No. , is GRANTED. 2. The Court approves the total award sought in the Fifth Application of $200,406.71, and, based on discussions between the SEC and the Receiver relating to holdbacks, authorizes the payment of: (a) $133,060.00 in legal fees and $468.15 in costs, totaling $133,528.15 to Nelson Mullins Broad and Cassel, for work performed and costs incurred by the Receiver and his counsel, a portion of which will be paid directly to Sale Weintraub, P.A. for the Receiver; (b) $23,970.00 in professional fees and $271.60 in costs, totaling $24,241.60 to Kapila Mukamal, the Receiver’s accountants; and (c) $3,379.46 in professional fees to Dickinson Wright LLP. 3. The Receiver may make all payments described in this Order from the bank accounts maintained for the Receivership Entities. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on October 7, 2020.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies to:
Counsel of Record
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Norman v. The Hous. Auth. OF the City OF Montgomery, 836 F.2d 1292 (11th Cir. 1988)