ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL
v.
SYSTEMAX, INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, awarding plaintiff compensatory damages, punitive damages, and costs.
Plaintiff sued defendants. The Magistrate Judge recommended awarding plaintiff compensatory damages, punitive damages, and costs. No objections were f…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Report And Recommendation cases and more on FLexlaw
a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
v. SYSTEMAX, INC., a Delaware corporation, and AFLIGO MARKETING SERVICES, INC. f/k/a WORLDWIDE REBATES, INC. d/b/a AFLIGO, a Florida corporation,
Defendants. ________________________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow [DE 144], dated August 31, 2020. The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 144] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 144] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F. 2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F. 2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 144] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s reasoning and conclusions. The Report Plaintiff Asus Computer International be awarded compensatory damages in the amount of $1,031,623.62 inclusive of pre-judgment interest, punitive damages in the amount of $902,662.36, and costs in the amount of $465.00. Accordingly, itis ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report [DE 144] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED;
2. The Court will issue a separate final judgment.
3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to the address below. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 24" day of September, 2020.
: fo ™ j a 4 “4 if f ? f , —_ 4 ye ze #4 v Paty d ‘4 ase [...] fe a VAY “2, A (Ma
VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS
United States District Judge
Copies furnished to: Counsel of record Afligo Marketing Services, Inc. c/o Registered Agents Inc., Registered Agent 7901 4th Street North, Suite 300, St. Petersburg, Florida 33702
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- LoCONTE v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745 (11th Cir. 1988)
- LoConte v. Dugger, 488 U.S. 958 (U.S. 1988)