SANDERS
v.
DR. GLENN PEARSON

S.D. Fla. | 2020-09-04
No. 19-cv-60607
District Court, S.D. Florida (2020) Positive Treatment

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court denied the plaintiff's motion for clarification because federal courts cannot provide legal advice.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff Benjamin Sanders, proceeding pro se, sought clarification on the procedure for a writ of execution after a writ was issued against Defendant…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

Glenn Anthony Pearson, in the amount of $14,000.00. On August 25, 2020, a Process Receipt and Return, ECF No. , was filed stating the Writ was served on Doctor Glenn Anthony Pearson at the Broward County Sheriff’s Office.1 Plaintiff now asks the Court to “clarify the procedure of writ of execution,” stating he has limited knowledge of the same and has limited access to the law library due to the COVID-19 health crisis. See ECF No. at 1. While the Court is sympathetic to Plaintiff’s lack of legal resources given the current health crisis, it cannot give Plaintiff legal advice. See R.T. Vanderbilt Co. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Comm’n, 708 F. 2d 570, 574 (11th Cir. 1983) (“The judicial power of the federal courts is limited by Article III to adjudication of the legal rights of litigants in actual controversies.”

(citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); In re Motion to Compel Testimony of Perry Orlando, No. MC 14-60624, 2014 WL 12628473, at *1 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 17, 2014) (“Federal courts cannot give litigants legal advice.”). Plaintiff may use the resources available to him, including the law library once it reopens, to deliver the Writ to the recipient, the United States Marshal Service, and undertake the necessary next steps to execute the Writ in order to levy on Defendant’s assets. Plaintiff may also obtain legal counsel to assist his effort. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff, Benjamin Sanders’s Motion for Clarification, ECF No. , is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on September 4, 2020.

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: Benjamin Sanders, pro se

L71796

Tomoka Correctional Institution Inmate Mail/Parcels 3950 Tiger Bay Road Daytona Beach, FL 32124 Dr. Glenn Pearson Broward County Sheriff’s Office 555 SE Ist Ave Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Footnotes
1 Prior to the issuance of the Writ, the Court entered an Order to Amend [the Writ] by Interlineation to correct the spelling of Defendant’s name. See ECF No. . The Return states the Order was served along with the Writ. See ECF No. . Case No. 19-cv-60607-BLOOM/Reid

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw