KLENTON MCLEMORE, APPELLANT,
v.
PENNY MCLEMORE, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Distribution Of Marital Assets cases and more on FLexlaw
BARFIELD, Judge.
Klenton McLemore appeals from a final order awarding child support, alimony and distribution of marital assets. We hold that the trial court’s awards of child support and alimony satisfy the reasonableness test enunciated in Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980). However, the distribution of marital property pursuant to paragraph ten is unclear and inconsistent with the alimony award. Therefore, we reverse and remand for clarification and further distribution of real property pursuant to paragraph ten of the final order. Additionally, we provisionally grant appellee’s motion for attorney’s fees on appeal and remand to the trial court for determination of a reasonable fee amount, in accordance with the rationale of Dresser v. Dresser, 350 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).
JOANOS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Klenton McLEMORE v. McLEMORE, 567 So. 2d 23 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)…ideration of appellee’s motions to dismiss. We grant the motions to dismiss. The parties were divorced in 1983. Husband took an appeal and this court specifically affirmed the trial court’s awards of child support and alimony. McLemore v. McLemore, 537 So. 2d 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Because the distribution of marital property was unclear and inconsistent with [*24] the alimony awarded, the case was reversed and remanded for clarification. When husband failed to make the alimony payments, wife filed a moti…
Authorities Cited
- Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)
- Peavy v. State, 350 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)
- Dresser v. Dresser, 350 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)