MENDOZA
v.
SKECHERS U.S.A RETAIL, LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Court grants the parties' renewed joint motion for approval of settlement and approves the revised settlement agreement.
The parties submitted a revised settlement agreement after the court denied approval of the initial agreement. The revised agreement addresses the cou…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Confidentiality Clause cases and more on FLexlaw
1. The parties’ Renewed Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement, ECF No. , is GRANTED.! 2. The Revised Agreement, ECF No. [29-1], is APPROVED in its entirety. 3. The Case is DISMISSED with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorney’s fees except as otherwise agreed.
4. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.
5. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Agreement. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on June 12, 2020.
BETH BLOOM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies to: Counsel of Record
' The Court notes that, like the Initial Agreement, the Revised Agreement contains a confidentiality provision. See Revised Agreement § 2e. As noted in the June 3, 2020 Order denying approval of the Initial Agreement, agreements subject to the Court’s approval become a part of the judicial record and therefore may not be deemed confidential even if the parties so consent. See Jessup v. Luther, 277 F. 3d 926, 929-30 (7th Cir. 2002). Nevertheless, while the confidentiality provision seems to indicate the parties seek to maintain the Revised Agreement’s confidentiality, the parties did not file the Revised Agreement under seal, so it appears on the public docket.