ALPHONSO MCCREARY, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Medina v. State, 604 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)
  …conditions of probation without orally announcing them. He objects to other conditions as being vague or improper. However, appellant failed to either object or file a motion to strike, and has waived these arguments on appeal. See Brunson v. State, 537 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). We vacate appellant’s sentence and remand for proceedings consistent herewith. PARKER and BLUE, JJ., concur.…
• Myren Wayne Larson v. State, 553 So. 2d 226 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
  …the error of which appellant now complains was not appropriately preserved for appellate review. The defendant may not appeal conditions of his probation which he neither objected to nor filed a motion to strike or to correct. See Brunson v. State, 537 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Appellant additionally urges that that portion of the trial court’s probation order, containing the condition that appellant submit to mental health counseling as directed by his probation officer, constb tutes an unlawful dele…
• Boudreaux v. State, 553 So. 2d 376 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
  …t did not object to this condition does not preclude appellate review. Peterson v. State, 543 So. 2d 358 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). However, because the appellant did fail to object, the remaining conditions are not preserved for review. Brunson v. State, 537 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Therefore, the remaining conditions are affirmed without prejudice to the appellant to file a motion under Rule 3.800, Fla.R. of Crim.P., in order to bring any error to the attention of the trial court. AFFIRMED in part; REVER…

Authorities Cited

• Poore v. State, 531 So. 2d 161 (Fla. 1988)