STEVE CRAIG MOORE, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Jones v. State, 790 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
  …DCA 1999), this court stated that an order on a motion for a judgment of acquittal is reviewed by the de novo standard, yet in Whetstone v. State, 778 So. 2d 338 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), Lee v. State, 745 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), Moore v. State, 537 So. 2d 693 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), and Barnett v. State, 444 So. 2d 967 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), the court said that such an order is reviewed by the abuse of discretion standard. For the reasons that follow, we adhere to our decision in Williams and hold that an ord…
• Parrish v. State, 540 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
  …reasons, we hold that the trial court committed reversible error in failing to conduct a full Neil inquiry. See Blackshear; Neil; Hargrove v. State, 530 So. 2d 441 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). Reversed and remanded for a new trial. . In Del Sol v. State, 537 So. 2d 693 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), this court held that ‘‘[a] defendant, whatever his race, has standing to challenge the arbitrary exclusion of members of any race for ... jury service.” We mention defendant’s race solely because our decision conflicts withjdeci-…
• Moriyon v. State, 543 So. 2d 379 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
  …n part, quashed in part on other grounds, 486 So. 2d 565 (Fla.1986); Rodriguez v. State, 539 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Parrish v. State, 540 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Hernandez v. State, 538 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Del Sol v. State, 537 So. 2d 693 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). The Florida supreme court limited the impact of Neil to “peremptory challenges of distinctive racial groups solely on the basis of race,” reserving for another day the question whether Neil is implicated where group bias is based…