TURNER
v.
HOMESTEAD POLICE DEPARTMENT

S.D. Fla. | 2020-02-10
No. 18-cv-24005
District Court, S.D. Florida (2020)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The district court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, granting summary judgment for all defendants and closing the case.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff filed a complaint alleging violations of federal and state law. The case was referred to a magistrate judge who recommended granting summary…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Magistrate Judge Chris McAliley’s Report and Recommendation on Motions for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 230] (“Report”). On September 4, 2018, Plaintiff Mark Turner filed his Complaint against Defendants Charter Schools, USA, Inc., and Homestead Police Department for violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, various Florida state law provisions, and common law torts.1 [ECF No. 1]. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge McAliley pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) for a ruling on all pretrial, non-dispositive motions and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive motions. [ECF No. 76].

On January 14, 2020, Judge McAliley issued her Report recommending that Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment [ECF Nos. 190, 192] be granted. Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Report [ECF No. 241] to which Defendants City of Homestead and Homestead Police Department replied [ECF No. 245]. A district court may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Those portions of the report and recommendation to which

Underwriters, L.L.C., 199 F. Supp. 2d 1271, 1276 (M.D. Fla. 2001); accord Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). The Court, having conducted a de novo review of the record, agrees with Judge McAliley’s well-reasoned analysis and findings that Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment be granted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: (1) Judge McAliley’s Report and Recommendation on Motions for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 230] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED and incorporated into this Order by reference. (2) Defendants’, Charter Schools USA, Inc., and Keys Gate Charter School, Motion

for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 190] is GRANTED. (3) Defendants’, City of Homestead and Homestead Police Department, Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 192] is GRANTED. (4) The Calendar Call set for February 12, 2020, at 9:30 am and Jury Trial set for the February 17, 2020, trial period are hereby CANCELLED and shall be removed from the Court’s calendar. (5) Defendants shall move for final judgment within fourteen (14) days of this Order. (6) All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT, save for Defendants’ Amended Motion for Sanctions and Attorney’s Fees for Plaintiff’s Bad-Faith Discovery Violations [ECF No. 141], because it relates to Plaintiffs conduct during discovery and not to the merits or procedural posture of the case. (7) This action is CLOSED for administrative purposes. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 10th day of February, 2020.

Df

DARRIN P. GAYLES

UNITED STATES DISURICT JUDGE

Footnotes
1 Defendants removed the case to this Court on September 27, 2018. [ECF No. 1]. Plaintiff later amended his Complaint to add Defendants Keys Gate Charter School and City of Homestead. [ECF No. 37]. objection is made are accorded de novo review, if those objections “pinpoint the specific findings that the party disagrees with.” United States v. Schultz, 565 F. 3d 1353, 1360 (11th Cir. 2009); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Any portions of the report and recommendation to which no specific objection is made are reviewed only for clear error. Liberty Am. Ins. Grp., Inc. v. WestPoint

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw