ALBERT ROY DICKERSON, APPELLANT,
v.
TAWNY K. SWANSON, APPELLEE
ALBERT ROY DICKERSON, APPELLANT,
TAWNY K. SWANSON, APPELLEE
537 So. 2d 717
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. It is the trial court’s findings “at the present time,” that is to say, the date of his Final Judgment, September 24,1987, to which this opinion is addressed. We assume, if the passage of time has given rise to a substantial change of the facts considered below, the aggrieved party will consider having the issue of visitation revisited by the trial judge.
GLICKSTEIN and GARRETT, JJ., and KAHN, MARTIN D., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Almeroth v. Gov't Emps. Ins. Co., 587 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)…otion to dismiss, including pleadings from the property damage action and the stipulated dismissal of the first cause of action. The trial court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with prejudice, and we reversed in Almeroth v. Gov’t Employees Ins. Co., 537 So. 2d 717 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). This court apparently agreed with appellants that the trial court had improperly looked beyond the four corners of the complaint in arriving at its ruling, and had considered GEICO’s affirmative defense presented by the exhibits…