PEPE
v.
PEPE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The District Court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation and dismissed plaintiff's case without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §1406(a) for improper venue, finding the case was filed in the wrong federal district and transfer would not serve the interests of justice.
The case is dismissed without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §1406(a) because it was filed in the wrong district and transferring it would not be in the interest of justice. Plaintiff may refile in the appropriate court if he can cure the pleading deficiencies identified in the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation.
“this case should be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. §1406(a) because it was filed in the wrong district and transferring it would not be in the interest of justice”
Establishes the court's holding that dismissal under §1406(a) is the appropriate remedy rather than transfer
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePlaintiff Steven Pepe filed a civil case in the Northern District of Florida. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation determined the case was…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Improper Venue cases and more on FLexlaw
This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (R&R) (Doc. 7). No objections were filed. [fn 1]
Upon due consideration of the R&R and the entire case file, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge's determination that this case should be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. §1406(a) because it was filed in the wrong district and transferring it would not be in the interest of justice. See Pepe v. Confreda, 2025 WL 1735733 (N.D. Fla. June 23, 2025). The dismissal is “without prejudice" so Plaintiff can file
Page 1 of 2
the case is an appropriate court, assuming he can cure the pleading deficiencies identified in the R&R.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
1. The magistrate judge's R&R is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §1406(a).
3. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.
4. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close the case file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of July, 2025.
T. KENT WETHERELL, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
[fn 1]: After the R&R was entered, Plaintiff filed a “verified second amended complaint" (Doc. 8) and second motion to proceed in form pauperis (Doc. 9). Neither of these filings take issue with the magistrate judge's analysis in the R&R. Moreover, the “verified second amended complaint” supports the magistrate judge's conclusion that this case was filed in the wrong district because it alleges that "[v]enue is proper in the Middle District of Florida, Ft. Myers Division.” Doc. 8 at 1 (2). Indeed, it appears that the post-R&R filings may have been intended for the Middle District because the cover letter that accompanied them was addressed to the Clerk of that court. See Doc. 8-1.