BENBOE
v.
HAGAN
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court recommended dismissal of the case without prejudice.
Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee or file an in forma pauperis motion after being ordered to do so. Plaintiff also failed to respond to a show ca…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion To Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Ifp) cases and more on FLexlaw
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action by filing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 1). On July 17, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to either pay the $405.00 filing fee or file a properly completed in forma pauperis (IFP) motion within thirty days. (Doc. 3). The Court directed the Clerk of Court to send Plaintiff the correct set of IFP forms and notified Plaintiff that failure to comply with the Court's order would result in a recommendation of dismissal of the case. (Id.).
Plaintiff did not file an IFP motion or pay the filing fee within the time allowed. Therefore, on August 23, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause, within fourteen days, why the case should not be 1
dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court. (Doc. 5). The Court again notified Plaintiff that failure to comply with the Court’s order would result in a recommendation of dismissal of the case. (Id.). The deadline for compliance with the show cause order has passed, and Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, filed an IFP motion, or otherwise responded. Dismissal is, therefore, warranted. See N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 41.1 (authorizing dismissal when “a party fails to comply with an applicable rule or court order”); see also Frith v. Curry, 812 F. App’x 933, 935 (11th Cir. 2020) (affirming dismissal where the plaintiff failed to pay the initial partial filing fee and failed to respond to a magistrate judge’s order to show cause as to why the filing fee had not been paid).
Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with an order of the Court.
At Pensacola, Florida, this 19th day of September 2024.
/s/ Zachary C. Bolitho Zachary C. Bolitho United States Magistrate Judge
Notice to the Parties
Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within fourteen days of the date of the Report and Recommendation. Any different deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the Court's internal use only and does not control. An objecting party must serve a copy of the objections on all other parties. A party who fails to object to the magistrate judge's findings or recommendations contained in a report and recommendation waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court's order based on unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions. See 11th Cir. Rule 3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636. 3