RUDDER
v.
WYROSDICK
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation to grant the defendants' motion to dismiss.
Plaintiff filed a fifth amended complaint which the magistrate judge recommended be dismissed.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse De Novo Determination cases and more on FLexlaw
The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on July 5, 2023. (Doc. 57). The Court furnished the parties a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 57) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. 51), is GRANTED. 3. Plaintiff’s fifth amended complaint (Doc. 46) be DISMISSED as a shotgun pleading and for lack of standing.1
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this order and close the case. DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of September 2023.