BUFORD
v.
KIJAKAZI
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the Commissioner's decision as it was supported by substantial evidence and proper legal principles.
Plaintiff sought review of the Social Security Commissioner's decision. A magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation. No objections were file…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Substantial Evidence Standard cases and more on FLexlaw
The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on February 7, 2022. ECF No. 14. The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Because no objections were filed, the parties waived their right to challenge the District Court’s order based on the unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions. 11th Cir. Rule 3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Having considered the Report and Recommendation and the record, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 14, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED because it is supported by substantial evidence and premised on the proper legal principles. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g);
Lewis v. Callahan, 125 F. 3d 1436, 1440 (11th Cir. 1997). 3. Plaintiff’s motion to the Court to award reasonable attorney’s fees, is therefore, DENIED.
4. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the file
DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of April 2022.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
.