SLUDER
v.
AMATUCCI
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopted the magistrate judge's reports and recommendations, dismissing claims against T. Poynter and granting summary judgment for Rhonda Davis, while denying summary judgment for Drs. Amatucci and Rohana.
This case involves a magistrate judge's reports and recommendations regarding summary judgment motions. No objections were filed by the parties.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Duplicative Claims cases and more on FLexlaw
This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s two reports and recommendations, ECF Nos. 188 and 189. No objections have been filed. The reports and recommendations are correct and are adopted as the court’s opinion. IT IS ORDERED:
1. The reports and recommendations are accepted.
2. The claims against the defendant T. Poynter in his individual capacity are dismissed on the merits. 3. The claims against Mr. Poynter in his official capacity are dismissed as duplicative. See Busby v. City of Orlando, 931 F. 2d 764, 776 (11th Cir. 1991) (approving the dismissal of official-capacity defendants whose presence was merely redundant to the naming of an institutional defendant). 4. The summary-judgment motion, ECF No. 139, is granted in part and denied in part. Summary judgment is granted in favor of the defendant Rhonda Davis but denied as to the defendants Gerald Amatucci and M. Rohana. 5. I do not direct the entry of judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b).
6. The case is remanded to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. SO ORDERED on June 8, 2021. s/Robert L. Hinkle United States District Judge