RICKY RANDELL RIDDELL, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RICHARD L. DUGGER, FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, A.M. FONTANA, APPELLEES
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Writ Of Mandamus cases and more on FLexlaw
SHIVERS, Judge.
We affirm the trial court’s denial of Rid-dell’s petition for writ of mandamus (challenging the Commission’s calculation of his presumptive parole release date), on the basis of failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Riddell’s January 2, 1987 request for administrative review raised three points with regard to the calculation of a presumptive parole release date set in his 1982 case. Riddell’s October 27, 1987 petition for writ of mandamus, however, abandoned all three of those points and raised a new argument for the first time. Since Riddell failed to seek administrative review on the argument raised in his petition for writ of mandamus, the trial court correctly denied the petition. Dodd v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 380 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).
ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Roth v. Crosby, 884 So. 2d 407 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)…to whether Roth exhausted his administrative remedies pursuant to section 947.173, Florida Statutes (1999), which he was required to do before seeking review of the Commission's action in the circuit court. See Riddell v. Fla. Dep’t of Corrections, 538 So. 2d 132, 133 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). . We do not treat Roth’s timely filed notice of appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari because appeal is the appropriate avenue for review of the circuit court's order in this case. Compare Green v. Moore, 777 So. 2d…
-
Henderson v. Crosby, 891 So. 2d 1180 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)…f for the first time in his petition, for writ of mandamus filed with the circuit court. Each ground raised in a petition for extraordinary relief must first be presented to and addressed by the administrative agency. Riddell v. Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 538 So. 2d 132, 133 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Accordingly, we grant in part and deny in part certiorari. SILBERMAN and WALLACE, JJ„ concur.…
-
Claudio v. Shoar, 917 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)…n available remedy. AFFIRMED. PLEUS, C.J., and GRIFFIN, J., concur. . Claudio’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies is also fatal to his claim. See Henderson v. Crosby, 891 So. 2d 1180 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Riddell v. Fla. Dep't of Con., 538 So. 2d 132, 133 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) (holding that each ground raised in a petition for extraordinary relief must first be presented to and addressed by the administrative agency).…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Riddell v. State, 534 So. 2d 907 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
- Hurshel Ross Dodd v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 380 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)